Stop Relying on Humans
to Catch AI Threats
Cofense relies on 35 million humans to report threats. PhishFirewall uses an autonomous AI that stops them in milliseconds. Which do you trust?
Cofense
- Human-Powered Detection: Relies on users to report emails. Slow and error-prone.
- "Search and Destroy": Manual remediation. Admins must search for threats and remove them.
- Static Training: Library-based content that requires manual assignment.
PhishFirewall
- AI-Powered Detection: PhishEQ catches threats in milliseconds, even if they bypass your SEG.
- Auto-Remediation: Threats are automatically quarantined across your entire environment. Zero touch.
- AI Cyber Coach: Lora trains users individually based on their real-time risk profile.
Feature-by-Feature Breakdown
Why the "Human Layer" Isn't Enough
Cofense admits that SEGs are failing. But their solution is to add more work for your humans. We believe the solution is better AI.
105% Increase in Bypass
Malicious emails bypassing SEGs have doubled. Humans can't keep up with this volume. AI can.
Speed is Everything
It takes minutes (or hours) for a human to report a phish. It takes milliseconds for PhishEQ to identify and neutralize it.
Zero Admin Burden
Cofense requires admins to "Search and Destroy." PhishFirewall handles the remediation for you, 24/7.
"We looked at Cofense, but the manual workload was too high. PhishFirewall gave us better protection without adding headcount."
Common Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Automate Your Defense?
See how much time you can save by switching from manual 'Search and Destroy' to autonomous AI.
- Free Risk Assessment
- Migration Plan Included
- No Credit Card Required
